In an interim opinion published this week, legal experts of the Council of Europe's Venice Commission appreciate efforts by the new government in Moldova to fight corruption in government with judicial reform, but the proposals must respect the Constitution in force.
Last month, Moldovan Justice Minister Olesea Stamate requested the opinion on proposed reform of the Supreme Court of Justice and the Prosecutor's Office. The reform follows the establishment of the new government and parliamentary coalition in Moldova in June this year, and a parliamentary declaration that oligarchs have been responsible for the "control" of the Prosecutor General's office and the justice system in general. Prime Minister Maia Sandu furthermore declared that her mandate is to curb the power of oligarchs. As a result, the proposed reform establishes an extra judiciary mechanism that would re-evaluate all key persons in the judiciary and the prosecutor's offices.
Part of the reform has been met with some resistance from within the judiciary. Last month, judges submitted a request to the Superior Council of Magistracy (SCM) to convoke an extraordinary assembly of judges for the revocation of the Council's judge members' mandate. On 18 September, following the judges' application against the SCM's refusal to do so, the Chisinau Court of Appeal issued a decision obliging the Superior Council to convene the extraordinary assembly, which took place on 27 September. The Assembly withdrew the mandate of the 6 judge members of the SCM.
In its joint Interim opinion with the Council of Europe's Directorate General of Human Rights and Rule of Law, the Venice Commission understands efforts of the Moldovan authorities to build a judiciary that promotes integrity and professionalism. It notes with satisfaction the commitment expressed by the Justice Minister to follow recommendations outlined in the opinion before finalizing the draft law and to submit the revised version of the draft law to the Commission for its final opinion. The opinion acknowledges that it us up to the Moldovan authorities to decide whether the prevailing situation in the judiciary creates enough basis for subjecting all sitting Supreme Court judges to extraordinary re-evaluation, as provided by the draft law.
A major concern is that the draft law combines such a vetting process with the reform of the Supreme Court, aimed at replacing the existing Supreme Court by a new court having a different jurisdiction and fewer judges. The combination between two different purposes obstructs the justification for subjecting all sitting Supreme Court judges to extraordinary re-evaluation and for the interference with the principle of "irremovability" of judges, according to the opinion.
This justification is even more important, as such vetting may create a dangerous precedent and may lead to an expectation that there will be a vetting scheme after each change of government, which would undermine the motivation of the judiciary and reduce its independence, the experts conclude.
Several recommendations in the opinion including the following:
- the draft law needs to be compliant with the Constitution, therefore all decisions concerning the transfer, promotion and removal from office of judges should be taken by the Superior Council of Magistracy. The Superior Council should thus be entrusted with the power to take decisions based on the recommendation contained in the report of the Evaluation Committee. The decision of the Superior Council should be public and fully reasoned and should be triggered automatically by the evaluation committee's report; provision could be made for the previous evaluation of the members of the Superior Council of Magistracy;
the draft law should not provide for an appeal against the evaluation report from one board of the Evaluation Committee to the other board; instead the draft law should provide for an appeal before a judicial body against the decisions of the Superior Council of Magistracy based on such report. This judicial body should be designed outside the cohort of judges of the Supreme Court of Justice. The criteria for selection of its members and the procedure to be followed should be set out in the law;
- the evaluation criteria that should be used in the course of the extraordinary evaluation process with respect to integrity, professionalism and lifestyle of judges should be indicated clearly and exhaustively in the draft law, and they should be the same as those already in force concerning the disciplinary liability and performance evaluation of judges;
- the number of members of the Evaluation Committee with a judicial background (i.e. former judges or former constitutional court judges) should be increased so that a substantial number of the members (if not half) has judicial background;
- the reversed burden of proof on the judge in the evaluation should be removed;
- the judge who failed the integrity evaluation should not be offered any judicial office, even in lower courts but should be subjected to a disciplinary sanction proportional to the gravity of the wrongdoing. The situation is different in case of failure to pass the professional evaluation.
Council of Europe Communications
On 12 May 2020 the Chișinău Appeals Court barred Danube Logistics SRL from transferring funds to its Dutch shareholder Danube Logistics Holding BV. Danube Logistics SRL is the operator of Giurgiulești International Free Port located on the maritime section of the Danube.( ) Read all
On the building that once housed the local headquarters of the Soviet secret police in the Russian city of Tver, where 80 years ago thousands of Polish prisoners of war were murdered, plaques commemorating the victims of Stalinist crimes were today removed.( ) Read all
That is the message the country's Constitutional Court sent to the European Union on Tuesday as it delivered a landmark ruling on the legality of the European Central Bank’s bond-buying programs, a decision many observers say challenges both the independence of the ECB and the...( ) Read all
The cost of a three-course meal at Bord For En (Table For One), a pop-up restaurant in Sweden opening May 10, is left to the diner's discretion. And that is diner, singular, just like the restaurant's name suggests.( ) Read all
A new virus, SARS-CoV-2, emerged in the Chinese city of Wuhan at the end of 2019. Infected persons developed an atypical form of pneumonia, later known as COVID-19. The pathogen created a pandemic, with fatalities throughout the world, and also led to the adoption of restrictive measures...( ) Read all
The two powers amplify discredited conspiracy theories and sow division as they look to undermine the United States. China and Russia have both seized on the novel coronavirus to wage disinformation campaigns that seek to sow doubts about the United States’ handling of the crisis and...( ) Read all
Opinion polls and authoritarian systems don’t go together. However professional or independent the pollster, any results are necessarily skewed as people weigh their responses — especially to questions about the regime — against potential consequences. Political scientists...( ) Read all
The 15-year-old boy from the Yanomami indigenous tribe lived in a remote village such as this one. (CNN) A teenager from an isolated Amazonian tribe who tested positive for Covid-19 has died, raising concerns about the coronavirus' impact on the region's indigenous people.( ) Read all
(CNN)The body of Maeve Kennedy Townsend McKean has been found by divers, police said. Members of a dive and rescue team found the body in 25 feet of water, about 2.5 miles from her mother's residence, around 5:31 p.m. Monday, the Maryland Natural Resources Police said in a statement.( ) Read all
Spain has recorded another 864 deaths related to coronavirus, the highest in one day, as the total number of deaths across Europe has gone beyond 30,000. More than 9,000 people have died in Spain, which is second only to Italy in fatalities caused by the virus. Confirmed cases in the country...( ) Read all